, Mr Müller throws here to the question of what a criminal defense lawyer can and must. The
chosen by the example of the different teaching various witnesses by a judge, it shows quite clearly what should a defender in any case. He should not let such a judicial irrelevant similarities buy the cutting.
Does it always so beautiful, the lawyer was court or tribunal, then it must in this context not only allowed, but must be offered even to call a witness, the court advising of his duty to truth again in memory.
In such a situation, one should therefore also against judicial resistance confidently continue teaching. What - other than a destabilized witness who then chooses his words more carefully, perhaps - is to happen?
0 comments:
Post a Comment