called me this afternoon to a dear colleague and after we had discussed "our" case, we got to chat.
people over 30 will revel ever quite fast in memory of the student (there are something like a phenomenon Feuerzangenbowle?) And it was also with us.
My colleague could the professors of different disciplines to describe more closely with reference to their phenotypes: the civil law experts were in three parts, which were pralierend casually with one hand in his pocket their lectures. The Öffentlichrechtler usually wore combinations which sometimes did not quite fit each other and the criminal law were in the corduroy pants (sometimes with patches). We may have studied at different universities, but also I recognized one or two of my professors in the description.
Where we were able fact that the criminal law had the greatest entertainment value. I remember a professor who said a feature of serious bodily injury, namely the loss of an important element as follows: "If you look at the question of whether the male member is a so-called important link According to the definition, this is the case, though. it with another body part connected by a joint. This one will have to deny the male member, although it is very flexible ... "Everything else went in laughter as.
Herrlich. Since one wishes for smooth, sit again in a lecture.
0 comments:
Post a Comment